Neighbourhood Governance in Urban China

Neighbourhood Governance in Urban China

Edited by Ngai-Ming Yip

As the economy and society of China has become more diversified, so have its urban neighbourhoods. The last decade has witnessed a surge in collective action by homeowners in China against the infringement of their rights. Research on neighbourhood governance is sparse and limited so this book fills a vital gap in the literature and understanding.

Chapter 9: Differentiated neighbourhood governance in transitional urban China: comparative study of two housing estates in Guangzhou

Werner Breitung

Subjects: asian studies, asian geography, asian politics and policy, asian urban and regional studies, politics and public policy, asian politics, regulation and governance, urban and regional studies, urban studies

Extract

Chinese cities are presently made up of a mix of neighbourhoods, produced by the state or private investors. With the institutional reforms, the urban housing system has since the 1980s witnessed the change from housing supply as welfare towards housing produced and marketed as a commodity. Because this reform was implemented along various paths and through different stages, Chinese cities are now characterized by the coexistence of different housing types, produced by the state or private investors. Besides urbanized villages and residual pre-1949 private buildings, housing types range from the housing stock produced and distributed by the work units (danwei) during the socialist period, most of which were later sold to the occupants at a low price (fanggaifang), to non-subsidized property provided by private developers according to market mechanisms (shangpingfang). In between are hybrid types such as economical housing or what our study calls 'welfare housing', where the residential units were built by the danwei in order to be sold at a reduced price to their employees. This can be regarded as a transitional arrangement. The coexistence of different housing types can be interpreted either in the context of institutional transition or as a phenomenon of social disintegration. In any case, the differentiation of production modes crucially goes along with a differentiation of neighbourhood governance. This chapter analyses this in detail, based on two narratives of stakeholder interaction and local decision-making in two housing estates with different development paths.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information