Handbook of Research Methods in Tourism

Handbook of Research Methods in Tourism

Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches

Elgar original reference

Edited by Larry Dwyer, Alison Gill and Neelu Seetaram

This insightful book explores the most important established and emerging qualitative and quantitative research methods in tourism. The authors provide a detailed overview of the nature of the research method, its use in tourism, the advantages and limitations, and future directions for research.

Chapter 23: Content Analysis

Svetlana Stepchenkova

Subjects: development studies, tourism, environment, environmental sociology, tourism, geography, tourism, research methods, qualitative research methods, quantitative research methods

Extract

Svetlana Stepchenkova NATURE OF CONTENT ANALYSIS AND ITS EVOLUTION Content analysis was famously defined by Harold Lasswell as the technique that “aims at describing, with optimum objectivity, precision, and generality, what is said on a given subject in a given place at a given time” (Lasswell et al., 1952, p. 34). More recently, Weber (1990, p. 9) defined content analysis as “a research method that uses a set of procedures to make valid inferences from text.” While these definitions emphasize textual materials as objects of content analysis, other scholars consider the method applicable to a broader range of content. According to Cartwright (1953, p. 424), the term refers “to the objective, systematic, and quantitative description of any symbolic behavior.” In a similar definition Berelson (1952, p. 18) states that “content analysis is a research technique for the objective, systematic, and quantitative description of the manifest content of communication.” Shapiro and Markoff (1997, p. 14) comparatively analysed various definitions of the term along several dimensions and suggested their own “minimal definition”: content analysis is “any methodological measurement applied to text (or other symbolic material) for social science purposes.” Content analysis examines data for patterns and structures, singles out the key features, develops categories, and aggregates them into perceptible constructs in order to seize meaning of communications (Gray and Densten, 1998); thus, the process involves the systematic reduction of the content flow, whether textual or otherwise symbolic. Content analysis is capable of capturing a richer sense of concepts within the data due...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information