Managing Transaction Costs in the Era of Globalization

Managing Transaction Costs in the Era of Globalization

Advances in New Institutional Analysis series

Frank A.G. den Butter

Frank A.G. den Butter explains the importance and means of keeping transaction costs as low as possible. He illustrates how this transaction management can contribute to making firms and nations more competitive by exploiting gains from the division of labour and international fragmentation of production, and uses relevant case studies to illustrate how value is created by reducing transaction costs. Policy recommendations for strengthening the competitive position of trading nations and reducing implementation costs of government policy are presented, and management methods for creating value in organizing production on a global scale are prescribed.

Chapter 9: Government intervention and transaction management

Frank A.G. den Butter

Subjects: economics and finance, institutional economics, international economics


This chapter shows, from a normative economic perspective, how the government can contribute, by linking trade and innovation policy, to reducing transaction costs and thereby achieving welfare gains. The main argument is that a major reason for government intervention is to repair market failures. Therefore, government trade and innovation policy should concentrate on knowledge spillovers in transaction management that bring about positive externalities. An example of the provision of public goods in this respect is national branding. Here, government should ensure that no damage is done to the reputation of trustworthy trading partners. By way of an example, the possible role of the government in SCM is considered. The chapter also pays ample attention to the question of whether trade and innovation policy should be targeted to specific industrial sectors. This links to the discussion of how to conduct industrial policy without invoking international retaliation. This section discusses what the modern textbooks on ‘public sector economics’ generally consider the arguments for government intervention. It should be clearly stated that this perception of what the government should and should not do stems from the welfare theory of economics, and that the tasks of government that other disciplines may consider relevant are ignored here. Moreover, this economic theory of the public sector has a strong normative character: it is the idea that government aims to maximize societal welfare that prescribes how it has to operate. Hence from this perspective the role of government is formulated in terms of what the government should do.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information