Table of Contents

Constructing European Intellectual Property

Constructing European Intellectual Property

Achievements and New Perspectives

European Intellectual Property Institutes Network series

Edited by Christophe Geiger

This detailed study presents various perspectives on what further actions are necessary to provide the circumstances and tools for the construction of a truly balanced European intellectual property system. The book takes as its starting point that the ultimate aim of such a system should be to ensure sustainable and innovation-based economic growth while enhancing free circulation of ideas and cultural expressions. Being the first in the European Intellectual Property Institutes Network (EIPIN) series, this book lays down some concrete foundations for a deeper understanding of European intellectual property law and its complex interplay with other fields of jurisprudence as well as its impact on a broad array of spheres of social interaction. In so doing, it provides a well needed platform for further research.

Chapter 2: Pruning the European intellectual property tree: in search of common principles and roots

Edited by Christophe Geiger

Subjects: law - academic, european law, intellectual property law


A few years ago, William Cornish wondered whether intellectual property had not become ‘omnipresent, distracting, irrelevant’. Many others now doubt the coherence of the intellectual property regime and denounce its excessive development. Taking stock of these sound and always well-reasoned critiques, the conference organized in Strasbourg in the frame of the EIPIN assumed the uneasy task of reconstructing European intellectual property. This reform of the IP regime ought necessarily to begin with an assessment of the existing rules and their relevance. As the European Union knows a multiplicity of IP rights, from classical ones (copyright, patent, trademark or design) to more marginal ones, in terms of the economic sectors concerned (rights in databases, in plant varieties, in semiconductors, in geographical indications), the quest for consistency could integrate a reflection on the common core embedded in that diversity. Is there (and should there be) common ground and uniform principles across all intellectual property rights? And to what extent should diversity and specificity of intellectual property rights give way to a common approach?

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information