Table of Contents

Constructing European Intellectual Property

Constructing European Intellectual Property

Achievements and New Perspectives

European Intellectual Property Institutes Network series

Edited by Christophe Geiger

This detailed study presents various perspectives on what further actions are necessary to provide the circumstances and tools for the construction of a truly balanced European intellectual property system. The book takes as its starting point that the ultimate aim of such a system should be to ensure sustainable and innovation-based economic growth while enhancing free circulation of ideas and cultural expressions. Being the first in the European Intellectual Property Institutes Network (EIPIN) series, this book lays down some concrete foundations for a deeper understanding of European intellectual property law and its complex interplay with other fields of jurisprudence as well as its impact on a broad array of spheres of social interaction. In so doing, it provides a well needed platform for further research.

Chapter 15: Unfair competition: complementary or alternative to intellectual property in the EU?

Anselm Kamperman Sanders

Subjects: law - academic, european law, intellectual property law


The law of unfair competition can be characterized in that, unlike intellectual property rights, the scope of the legislation encompasses the functioning of the free market as a whole. The purpose of the law of unfair competition is to ensure that free and fair competition is maintained. Fair competition in a free market economy can be characterized by the fact that demand and supply determine the price of a product. This basic economic rationale that underlies a market economy requires that as a matter of principle there is freedom for competitors to copy and build upon the achievements of other market participants. Intellectual property rights can be justified as exclusive rights in relation to intellectual and industrial creativity only on the basis of the fact that they address specific instances of market failure in a market for original expressive works. In order to ensure a transparent and diversified market for products or services, the protection of trademarks or other badges of trade against confusing uses can equally be justified. Even the patent monopoly can be justified in the free market economy as it does not take away from the public something that existed before, but rather creates a competitive market in disclosed and novel inventive ideas themselves. In all instances public welfare is increased as more creative works will be produced, market transparency facilitates consumer choice, and technology can be incorporated in products, while disclosure opens claimed inventions up to scrutiny for improvement or alternatives.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information