Chapter 5: Liberalization of legal markets in UK and EU jurisdictions
In Part I of this book it has been argued that, while there are clear reasons why markets for legal services should be subject to some degree of regulation, there are also reasons to be cautious about self-regulatory bodies regulating lawyer behaviour in the interests of the profession and its members. This chapter examines how policy in many European jurisdictions has moved in the direction of liberalization. UK jurisdictions, to some extent, have led the way in this but other EU jurisdictions have also moved in this direction, particularly following the Treaty of Lisbon and the extension of freedom of movement to the professions. The chapter begins by discussing the liberalization that has taken place in UK jurisdictions and then turns to a selection of other EU jurisdictions. The next chapter will examine evidence on the effects of liberalization, particularly in the UK. In this chapter the broad direction of regulatory reform in a number of European jurisdictions is discussed.Whilst the evolution of regulatory regimes for the professions in Europe has been in the same direction as competition policy, these have been sometimes in parallel rather than in unison. Both competition policy and policy on professional regulation have had different starting points in different jurisdictions and until relatively recently have moved at a different pace.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.