Table of Contents

The Asia-Pacific, Regionalism and the Global System

The Asia-Pacific, Regionalism and the Global System

Edited by Christopher M. Dent and Jörn Dosch

The expert contributors shed critical light on how significant developments are impacting on the global system. In particular, they consider emerging forms of global governance, and how the Asia-Pacific as a region, individual countries such as China, Japan, South Korea and the US, and regional organisations and forums like APEC are shaping the world. Uniquely, the discussion is not limited to East Asia but also takes Latin America prominently into the equation.

Chapter 11: China and the Changing Nature of Globalisation

Jeffrey Henderson

Subjects: asian studies, asian economics, asian urban and regional studies, development studies, development studies, economics and finance, asian economics


Jeffrey Henderson 1. INTRODUCTION The re-emergence of China as a global economic and political power is beginning to have major consequences for political economies and societies in many parts of the world. One of the things that characterises the vast majority of research on these consequences, however, is that it operates at the level of the national (for example China and the United States) or world-regional (for example China and Africa) interfaces only. Very little of it seeks to understand the consequences of China’s rise for the nature of globalisation, and, through that ‘lens’, for particular national or sub-national political–economic and social formations.1 As will become clear below, this is an unfortunate omission for both science and policy. As a consequence, it is this concern that animates the arguments developed in this chapter. In reflecting on what the rise of China might mean for the nature of globalisation, two propositions will help to guide the subsequent argument. The first concerns the need to take ‘the global’ seriously as a level of analysis. While this argument has a history of nearly 40 years (Wallerstein 1974), the current form of US-driven globalisation (from the late 1970s/ early 1980s) and now China’s emerging global presence, serve to underline the need to break from state-centric modes of analysis (and their related expressions: ‘international’, ‘transnational’, and so on) in order to deliver the analytic categories necessary for an adequate understanding of the contemporary world and its problems. Global processes and the various forms of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information