Table of Contents

The Asia-Pacific, Regionalism and the Global System

The Asia-Pacific, Regionalism and the Global System

Edited by Christopher M. Dent and Jörn Dosch

The expert contributors shed critical light on how significant developments are impacting on the global system. In particular, they consider emerging forms of global governance, and how the Asia-Pacific as a region, individual countries such as China, Japan, South Korea and the US, and regional organisations and forums like APEC are shaping the world. Uniquely, the discussion is not limited to East Asia but also takes Latin America prominently into the equation.

Chapter 14: A Northeast Asian Model of ODA? Comparing Chinese, Japanese and Korean Official Development Assistance

James Reilly

Subjects: asian studies, asian economics, asian urban and regional studies, development studies, development studies, economics and finance, asian economics


James Reilly 1. INTRODUCTION World politics is undergoing a historic transition. Rising powers such as Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa, Turkey and India are challenging longstanding institutional arrangements, international norms and practices. Permanent membership on the United Nations Security Council, leadership of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, rules over global trade and responsibilities for climate change are all being contested. In the realm of official development assistance (ODA), a growing pluralism among aid donors and approaches has emerged as the most significant challenge to Western aid orthodoxy in decades. In response, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Development Assistance Committee (OECD-DAC) is striving to reshape international norms defining effective and appropriate ODA. Yet the DAC process faces a contradiction between being more inclusive by welcoming new members, collaborating with aid recipients, and collaborating with non-DAC members, while also being more exclusive by codifying and promulgating selective norms on ODA. Contestation over normative content and pervasive hypocrisy by major aid donors further undermine DAC norms. This chapter explores one aspect of this ongoing contestation; the alternative approach to development assistance employed by Japan, South Korea and China. Having finally secured entry into DAC in January 2010, South Korea pledged: ‘Korea will formulate an original Korean assistance model that transmits the country’s successful development experience aligned to the recipient country’s national development strategies’.1 In 2010, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao also announced the successful creation of a model 216 M2911 - DENT 9781781004463 PRINT.indd 216 29/05/2012 15:30 A Northeast Asian...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information