Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Biodiversity and Law

Research Handbook on Biodiversity and Law

Research Handbooks in Environmental Law series

Edited by Michael Bowman, Peter Davies and Edward Goodwin

This wide-ranging Handbook presents a range of perspectives from leading international experts reflecting up-to-date research thinking on the subject of biodiversity law, the crucial importance of which to human welfare is only now being fully appreciated. Through a rigorous examination of the principles, procedures and practices that characterise this area of law, this timely volume effectively highlights its objectives, implementation, achievements, and prospects. Presenting thematic rather than regime-based coverage, the editors demonstrate the state-of-the-art of current research and identify future research needs and directions.

Chapter 12: Common concern, common heritage and other global(-ising) concepts: rhetorical devices, legal principles or a fundamental challenge?

Duncan French

Subjects: environment, environmental law, law - academic, environmental law, public international law


The purpose of this chapter is to consider some of the underlying justifications for international legal action in relation to the conservation of natural resources and environmental protection more generally. As will be explored, the emphasis is not at the level of political or strategic considerations per se, but rather upon how States express to themselves, and to the wider international community, their motivations for action. While the relevance of why certain States act in certain ways should not be underplayed, this chapter focuses upon what conceptual justifications States have elaborated to provide the legal basis for doing so. In short, it reflects on those foundational aspects of international environmental law which are at the juncture of legal framework, sovereign discretion, collective interest and normative obligation. The focus of this chapter is primarily – though not exclusively – on multilateral aspects of international environmental law, rather than upon bilateral or regional commitments, or transboundary obligations in customary environmental law. This is not to deny the relevance or the contribution of such measures to the broader discipline, but only to indicate that for the current discussion, the focus is on such concepts as common concern, common heritage and natural heritage. These – and similar – ideas have had a profound effect on the reach and ambition of international environmental law, transforming international rules in the area from the specific, perhaps even in certain instances parochial, to the truly global.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information