Adaptation and Context
Elgar original reference
Edited by Anders Örtenblad
Chapter 18: Who is the learning organization for? A stakeholder contingency approach to contextualizing managerial panaceas
Similar to more classical contingency works, such as Mintzberg’s (1981, 1983) work on organizational structure and Fiedler’s (1978) work on leadership, research that aims to adapt management ideas to certain particular contexts tends to assume that effectiveness, limited to the single organization and/or individual, is the ultimate objective (e.g. Alavi & McCormick 2004; Sitkin et al. 1994). The literature that advises on the relevance of the learning organization idea to organizations in certain particular contexts is hardly any exception; while the choice of perspective is rarely made explicit and it is sometimes indeed difficult to interpret the authors’ intentions, it is evident from my literature reviews that there is a bias toward organizational effectiveness. This is, of course, in accordance with the strong focus on ‘utopian sunshine’ that the major part of the learning organization literature proclaims (Driver 2002). In response to this bias in the prior works I suggest a ‘stakeholder contingency approach’ and showcase an analysis made from such an approach, in which the relevance of the learning organization is examined from four stakeholder perspectives (see also Örtenblad 2011).
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.