Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Research Handbooks on Globalisation and the Law series

Edited by Ugo Mattei and John D. Haskell

Events such as the global financial crisis have helped reveal that the drivers and contours of governance on a national and international level remain a mystery in many respects. Set in this context, this timely Research Handbook is the first to explicitly address the constitutive relationship between law and political economy. With scholarly contributions from diverse disciplinary and geographic backgrounds, this authoritative book covers, in three parts, topics surrounding money and markets, the relations of organization, and commodities, land and resources.

Chapter 15: Personal responsibility for systemic inequality

Martha McCluskey

Subjects: development studies, development studies, law and development, economics and finance, political economy, law - academic, law and development, public international law, politics and public policy, political economy


‘Equality ha[s] come and gone as a social idea with traction, even among liberal intellectuals,’ concludes the American historian Daniel T. Rodgers. In this chapter I argue that equality’s undoing follows from an economic ideology of law that grounds justice in an illusory divide between individual agency and collective support. If equality means gaining from government protection rather than from individual production, then equality will appear to come at the cost of responsible action. This conceptual bind operates through two strands of personal responsibility arguments. The first, perhaps more familiar, version legitimates inequality by attributing it to individual failure. In recent global austerity politics, a second theory of personal responsibility legitimates inequality and insecurity even while attributing these harms to systemic failures far beyond individual control. Welfare reform efforts in the United States embraced the first strand of argument in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. A prominent rationale for that legislation was that the former national welfare program of income support for impoverished single mothers caused more women to become impoverished single mothers, in a cycle of dependency or moral hazard that effectively rewarded women for bearing and raising children without an employed husband or without sufficient earnings of their own. The reform legislation increased penalties and benefit restrictions in order to induce impoverished parents to seek wage work or marriage or to delay or forgo bearing (or raising) children.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information