Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Research Handbooks on Globalisation and the Law series

Edited by Ugo Mattei and John D. Haskell

Events such as the global financial crisis have helped reveal that the drivers and contours of governance on a national and international level remain a mystery in many respects. Set in this context, this timely Research Handbook is the first to explicitly address the constitutive relationship between law and political economy. With scholarly contributions from diverse disciplinary and geographic backgrounds, this authoritative book covers, in three parts, topics surrounding money and markets, the relations of organization, and commodities, land and resources.

Chapter 16: From the ‘semi-civilized state’ to the ‘emerging market’: remarks on the international legal history of the semi-periphery

Umut Özsu

Subjects: development studies, development studies, law and development, economics and finance, political economy, law - academic, law and development, public international law, politics and public policy, political economy


Over the past several decades, the historiography of international law has undergone a series of significant changes, arguably the most far-reaching of which is that specifically Euro-American experiences are no longer accorded the kind of weight they once were. Much of the new scholarship following from these changes has distanced itself from Eurocentrism by prioritizing questions relating to the colonized ‘periphery’. The ‘encounter’ between ‘civilized’ Europeans and ‘uncivilized’ non-Europeans, and the implications of this ‘encounter’ for the development of doctrines of sovereignty and recognition, is a particularly widespread theme in the literature, underpinning wide-ranging claims that the history of international law cannot be written in strictly Western terms. The shift in analytical perspective enacted by this new literature is both necessary and promising, and much has been made of its ambition to ‘provincialize Europe’. Interestingly, though, it has often had the effect of obstructing appreciation of peoples and polities historically deemed unassimilable to either of the two extremes of ‘civilization’ and ‘savagery’. Free from formal colonialism but subject nonetheless to a significant measure of informal imperialism, states like China, Japan, Korea, Morocco, Persia, Siam and the Ottoman Empire typically negotiated prevailing frameworks of international law with a relatively high degree of agency, not least on account of their social or geographical proximity to influential hubs of economic and intellectual activity.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information