Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Research Handbooks on Globalisation and the Law series

Edited by Ugo Mattei and John D. Haskell

Events such as the global financial crisis have helped reveal that the drivers and contours of governance on a national and international level remain a mystery in many respects. Set in this context, this timely Research Handbook is the first to explicitly address the constitutive relationship between law and political economy. With scholarly contributions from diverse disciplinary and geographic backgrounds, this authoritative book covers, in three parts, topics surrounding money and markets, the relations of organization, and commodities, land and resources.

Chapter 20: The political economy of court-based regulation

Patrick Luff

Subjects: development studies, development studies, law and development, economics and finance, political economy, law - academic, law and development, public international law, politics and public policy, political economy


With the rise of the modern state came increasing demands on the state to provide justice – to regulate the risks individual citizens increasingly present to one another, to ensure that contracts are enforced, or to ensure that individuals respect each other’s fundamental civil rights. Much of law can be seen as political decisions about whether and how to satisfy these demands. Over the last two decades political scientists and economists have become aware that courts are active participants in this process. Rather than delegate enforcement to administrative agencies, which might lead to partisan infighting as well as agency capture or drift, Congress has increasingly crafted statutes (especially those on controversial subjects) that create private rights of action. In so doing, Congress bypasses the traditional regulatory enforcement apparatus and instead makes individuals the enforcers of their statutory rights and courts the forum for enforcing regulatory rights. But the courts also act as regulators through the exercise of their traditional common law powers. Choices to adopt new theories of liability or relax causation requirements, for example, are driven by perceptions about the gap between governmentally provided and socially demanded levels of risk regulation, and this demand is transmitted to the courts through individual decisions to litigate. When courts act as a forum for rights enforcement, they play part of the role that an agency would normally play.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information