Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Research Handbooks on Globalisation and the Law series

Edited by Ugo Mattei and John D. Haskell

Events such as the global financial crisis have helped reveal that the drivers and contours of governance on a national and international level remain a mystery in many respects. Set in this context, this timely Research Handbook is the first to explicitly address the constitutive relationship between law and political economy. With scholarly contributions from diverse disciplinary and geographic backgrounds, this authoritative book covers, in three parts, topics surrounding money and markets, the relations of organization, and commodities, land and resources.

Chapter 22: The political economy of industrial policy: after the crisis, back on the agenda

Antonio Andreoni

Subjects: development studies, development studies, law and development, economics and finance, political economy, law - academic, law and development, public international law, politics and public policy, political economy


The debate surrounding industrial policies to promote manufacturing development has, since the eighteenth century, been one of the most important in political economy. Even before the appearance of Adam Smith’s celebrated Wealth of Nations, Antonio Serra’s Short Treatise addressed the problems of underdevelopment by focusing on economies of scale and agglomeration, with a specific focus on manufacturing. Paolo Mattia Doria and David Hume investigated what they called the ‘jealousy of trade’, while Antonio Genovesi in Naples and Cesare Beccaria in Milan proposed a set of policies that nations should follow in order to develop their manufactures and escape a situation of dependency. Alexander Hamilton and Friedrich List formulated the infant industry argument, later rediscovered by classical development economists in the second half of the twentieth century. Many of these classical developmentalist ideas again became central during the 1950s and 1960s. Economists like Rosenstein-Rodan, Ragnar Nurske, Albert Hirschman, Raul Prebish, Celso Furtado, Gunnar Myrdal, Joan Robinson and Nicholas Kaldor put forward a number of theories focused on developing countries’ catching up, structural transformation and manufacturing development. This developmentalist school built the foundations of the modern political economy debate on industrial policy and development. Theories of balanced and unbalanced growth, dualism within and across countries, institutional bottlenecks, circular and cumulative causation, and production linkages, were used to explain the nature of the industrialisation process and to propose a wide spectrum of selective industrial, trade and technology policies in developing countries.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information