Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Research Handbooks on Globalisation and the Law series

Edited by Ugo Mattei and John D. Haskell

Events such as the global financial crisis have helped reveal that the drivers and contours of governance on a national and international level remain a mystery in many respects. Set in this context, this timely Research Handbook is the first to explicitly address the constitutive relationship between law and political economy. With scholarly contributions from diverse disciplinary and geographic backgrounds, this authoritative book covers, in three parts, topics surrounding money and markets, the relations of organization, and commodities, land and resources.

Chapter 26: Indigenous peoples’ claims and challenges over control of property

Ivana Isailović

Subjects: development studies, development studies, law and development, economics and finance, political economy, law - academic, law and development, public international law, politics and public policy, political economy


This chapter examines, using the concept of political recognition, how the case law of the Inter-American and African human rights systems addresses indigenous communities’ claims over their ancestral lands. This topic is worthy of attention for several reasons. In recent years, there has been a proliferation of human rights cases on this question. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights [hereinafter IACtHR] and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights [hereinafter IAComHR] have decided many cases related to this issue, and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights [hereinafter ACHPR] handed down two landmark communications, Ogoni v Nigeria and Endorois Community v Kenya, addressing this topic. In addition, the Commission recently published several reports that analyze the situation of indigenous communities in Africa. What is noticeable is that human rights bodies recognized indigenous communities’ land rights although the treaties do not explicitly refer to their property rights. Cross-referencing here is key to understanding the similarities that run through the case law. Indeed, the African Commission often relies on and builds upon previous IACtHR case law to interpret the African Charter. This case law is further supported by evolutions within other legal regimes, such as the International Labour Organization (ILO) or the UN, to which human rights bodies make explicit reference. As a result of this, a relatively coherent body of human rights norms that determine indigenous communities’ property regimes emerge out of the judicial practice.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information