Business and Human Rights

Business and Human Rights

Edited by Wesley Cragg

Topics discussed include the debates leading to the creation of the ISO 26000 standard and the United Nations human rights framework for business entities, as well as the nature and limits of the human rights responsibilities of business, the roles and responsibilities of international trade bodies like the World Trade Organization in protecting human rights, and the implications of the current debate for international trade agreements and trade with China. The contributors also explore the effectiveness of voluntary human rights standards in the textile and clothing trade, mining, advertising and the pharmaceutical industries.

Chapter 2: Corporate social responsibility: beyond the business case to human rights

Tom Campbell

Subjects: business and management, business leadership, corporate governance, economics and finance, corporate governance, law - academic, human rights, politics and public policy, human rights

Extract

Much of the debate about corporate social responsibility (CSR) focuses on the ‘business case’, according to which CSR is morally permissible, or required, if and only if, and only to the extent that, it benefits the corporation in question (Cragg, 2004, pp. 123–6). The business case stimulates extensive research on the empirical question as to what extent and in what circumstances meeting CSR expectations does in fact promote or protect the interests of a corporation (Orlitsky, 2003; Schreck, 2009; Vogel, 2005). In contrast, this chapter addresses the normative question as to whether and when the responsibilities of corporations ought to go beyond the business case and, if so, how the boundaries of such ‘altruistic’ responsibilities could be drawn in a morally acceptable and economically prudent manner. It is argued that the CSR (as defined in this chapter) that goes beyond the business case is best approached in terms of human rights justifications. The suggestion is that requiring CSR beyond the business case is morally justified and a candidate for legal enforcement only if, and only to the extent that, it is for the protection or furtherance of the human rights of those affected. This is explored primarily in relation to those specific human rights violations by corporations that arise in the course of their business activities, but also applies both to corporate complicity with the human rights violations of states and to corporate responsibilities to assist or undertake state responsibilities with respect to protecting human rights violations by third parties.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information