Table of Contents

Handbook of Research on Negotiation

Handbook of Research on Negotiation

Elgar original reference

Edited by Mara Olekalns and Wendi L. Adair

Leading international scholars give insight into both the factors known to shape negotiation and the questions that we need to answer as we strive to deepen our understanding of the negotiation process. This Handbook provides analyses of the negotiation process from four distinct perspectives: negotiators’ cognition and emotion, social processes and social inferences, communication processes, and complex negotiations, covering trade, peace, environment, and crisis negotiations.

Chapter 4: Shared cognition and identity in negotiation

Leigh Anne Liu and Wei Cai

Subjects: business and management, organisational behaviour


The above quote shows how a Chinese diplomat understands Sino–American relationships and hopes for the understanding and metaphors to be shared by both parties. A shared mental model, or a common understanding of some situation or phenomenon among a dyad of individuals, has been an important goal for negotiators to pursue. Negotiation is a social exchange where individuals perceive themselves as having opposing interests regarding scarce resources (Bazerman et al., 2000). To be effective, each negotiation party needs to seek to claim as much of the resources as possible. At the same time, they need to establish agreements on not leaving resources on the bargaining table (Swaab et al., 2007). Thus, a key challenge for most negotiators is to align individual and group interests, which requires individual negotiators to recognize some overarching commonalities leading them to pursue outcomes that benefit themselves as well as others (Swaab et al., 2007). This is precisely what a shared mental model and identity may offer: They positively influence each other and group outcomes because they give rise to an understanding of underlying interests as well as a willingness to make trade-offs. Our purpose in this chapter is to propose an integrative input-output framework that organizes current literature and future directions on the study of shared cognition and identity in negotiation. We maintain that the input factors reflect negotiators’ perceptions of various antecedents to a dynamic process that cultivates shared cognition and identity.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information