Political Governance of Capitalism

Political Governance of Capitalism

A Reassessment Beyond the Global Crisis

Helmut Willke and Gerhard Willke

This path-breaking book highlights that systemic risks emerge from a globally operating financial industry that is not only disconnected from the real economy but also allowed to hide in ‘shadow banking’ practices. Governance based on national regimes fails to cover ‘finance-led’ global capitalism. The authors argue that the risk of systemic meltdown will reappear unless intelligent governance regimes are installed, combining legally binding rules and civil society pressures to restore the balance between risk-taking and accountability. They illustrate the goal is ‘resilient’ capitalism in which the rules of the game are set by politics and knowledge-based discourse.

Chapter 1: Exposition – Capitalism as Systemic Risk

Helmut Willke and Gerhard Willke

Subjects: economics and finance, political economy, politics and public policy, political economy, public policy, regulation and governance

Extract

What if capitalism were to collapse? Many critics of capitalism do not realize that there is no viable alternative to capitalism after the demise of socialism; there are only alternatives within market capitalism. Varieties of capitalism span a broad range from market fundamentalism to welfare capitalism, and these varieties correspond to varieties of democracy (Hall and Thelen 2005; Willke 2009a). As a specific governance regime for the economy, capitalism is based mainly on self-organization and self-governance of markets, supplemented with varying institutional arrangements to safeguard the proper functioning of the market. However, at the same time global capitalism has become a systemic risk, and the global financial crisis should be regarded as a ‘normal accident’ within an untenable architecture of global finance. This paradox of capitalism – presenting a systemic risk because of and in spite of its achievements – is the base-line for this book. Even market fundamentalists do not doubt that markets require legal institutions, political frameworks and cultural patterns in order to function as markets. The details of the relations between politics and economy, of the political preconditions of a market economy and of the architectures of a political economy are, of course, contested. But it seems evident that a positive, self-reinforcing relationship between capitalism and democracy depends on reining in the self-destructive tendencies of an unfettered market capitalism by defining rules for public goods (Malkin and Wildavsky 1991), rules for accountability (Held 2004; Keohane 2003), rules against ‘predatory’ abuses of market power (Shiller 2009) and rules for coping...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information