Table of Contents

International Handbook on Whistleblowing Research

International Handbook on Whistleblowing Research

Elgar original reference

Edited by A. J. Brown, David Lewis, Richard E. Moberly and Wim Vandekerckhove

In the modern age of institutions, whistleblowing is now established as one of the most important processes – if not the single most important process – by which governments and corporations are kept accountable to the societies they are meant to serve. This essential Handbook provides researchers and policy makers from around the world with a comprehensive overview of the state of our knowledge regarding this vital process. In addition to drawing from the last 30 years of progressively more systematic research into whistleblowing, it also provides cutting-edge analysis of the conceptual and practical challenges that researchers will want to confront in the next decade.

Chapter 4: Wrongdoing: Definitions, identification and categorizations

Marit Skivenes and Sissel C. Trygstad

Subjects: business and management, organisational behaviour, law - academic, corporate law and governance, corruption and economic crime, labour, employment law, politics and public policy, public policy


This chapter discusses the many aspects and dimensions of organizational wrongdoing that underpin and give rise to whistleblowing processes. Our aim is to examine the conceptual understanding of acts of wrongdoing and the factors that may influence perceptions of the distinction between acts of wrongdoing and non-wrongdoing by organization members: employees, managers, board members, workers and so forth. For simplicity, we include in the term ‘wrongdoing’ concepts such as ‘misconduct’, and behavior, whether it be ‘illegal’, ‘illegitimate’ or ‘immoral’. Consider the following situation: an employee observes what she believes is the harassment of another employee. Should she report this event? This depends on the context of the organization, society, sector, industry and country in which the worker is embedded. It is impossible to identify all conceivable organizational wrongdoings, but we can attempt to identify the main structural dimensions and factors that determine whether an action within an organization is considered ‘wrongdoing’ with regard to a potential whistleblowing process. There is a set of variables at the individual and contextual levels that may impact considerations of whether an event involves wrongdoing, what can rightfully be reported and what is protected. Such variables include legislation, the labor market model and country context, local and global norms, the type of organization, the role and obligations of organizational members and so forth. All legislation that sets standards for illegal and legal actions is important to the definition and understanding of wrongdoing in an organization.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information