Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, Fourth Edition
Chapter 4: Preserving Natural Capital in a World of Risk, Uncertainty and Ignorance
In the previous chapter it was shown that both paradigms are non-falsifiable. But the question still open is this: if society is faced with risk, uncertainty and ignorance about the consequences of running down natural capital, which forms, how much and at what cost should it preserve natural capital? This is the major topic of this chapter. The first aim of this chapter is to indicate which forms of natural capital are more likely to be non-substitutable than others and are therefore in need of preservation. Note the emphasis on ‘likely’: from the analysis in Chapter 3 it follows that the best we can hope for is to make a persuasive case for the importance of the preservation of natural capital. The major objective of this chapter lies somewhere else, however. It tries to explore the difficulties in finding the extent to which these forms of capital need to be preserved and how much cost should be incurred for preservation.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.