The Changing Face of US Patent Law and its Impact on Business Strategy

The Changing Face of US Patent Law and its Impact on Business Strategy

New Horizons in International Business series

Edited by Daniel R. Cahoy and Lynda J. Oswald

Within the complex global economy, patents function as indispensable tools for fostering and protecting innovation. This fascinating volume offers a comprehensive perspective on the US patent system, detailing its many uses and outlining several critical legislative, administrative and judicial reforms that impact business strategy.

Chapter 8: Will the America Invents Act postgrant review improve the quality of patents? A comparison with the European Patent Office opposition

Susan J. Marsnik

Subjects: business and management, international business


After years of attempts to reform its 60-year-old patent law, in September 2011 the United States enacted the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). The law ushers in substantial changes in US patent law and practice. Significant among the changes are a number of new trial proceedings through which third parties may challenge patents at the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) once the patent has issued. The AIA law introduced three new or revised post-issuance inter partes proceedings: post-grant review, inter partes review, and a specialized post-grant review for certain business methods. These proceedings address rising concerns over a perceived proliferation of poor quality patents due to substantial increases in the number of patent applications in the US. The primary avenue for testing the validity of patents in the US has been litigation, which is both costly and time-consuming. A primary justification for the new post-issuance proceedings was to provide a faster and less expensive alternative to litigation. Providing an opportunity for third parties to intervene post-issuance is not new in the US system. Since 1981, third parties or the patent owner have been able to request an examination of an already issued patent through an ex parte reexamination.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information