Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Transparency

Research Handbook on Transparency

Elgar original reference

Edited by Padideh Ala’i and Robert G. Vaughn

In the last two decades transparency has become a ubiquitous and stubbornly ambiguous term. Typically understood to promote rule of law, democratic participation, anti-corruption initiatives, human rights, and economic efficiency, transparency can also legitimate bureaucratic power, advance undemocratic forms of governance, and aid in global centralization of power. This path-breaking volume, comprising original contributions on a range of countries and environments, exposes the many faces of transparency by allowing readers to see the uncertainties, inconsistencies and surprises contained within the current conceptions and applications of the term.

Chapter 7: Transparency under dispute: public relations, bureaucracy, and democracy in Mexico

Irma Eréndira Sandoval

Subjects: law - academic, comparative law, constitutional and administrative law, corporate law and governance, corruption and economic crime, information and media law, labour, employment law, regulation and governance


Democracies in search of ways to prevent the halting of accountability and answerability would be well served by gazing into the mirror of the paradoxical and uneven trajectory of transparency in Mexico. A decade ago Mexico was featured by many as a paradigmatic example of institutional engineering for accountability, including sophisticated constitutional reforms creating regulatory and oversight agencies, freedom of information provisions and citizen empowerment. But in spite of these formal achievements, the country has in fact become an example of bureaucratization, over-politicization and the watering-down of accountability. Many expected the emergence of vigorous political competition over the last two decades in Mexico to have a positive impact on corruption and accountability. But this has not been the case since competition between political parties has not translated into better oversight or an improved equilibrium between social interests and government institutions. In this chapter, I will explore the details of this process in order to learn how best to understand, define and practice transparency in a way that prevents the “freezing” of democratization processes in the developing world. If new democracies are unable to demonstrate that they are more effective and accountable than the previous authoritarian systems, democracy and elections are put at risk. In addition, transparency, like democracy, is a “politically contested” concept that can be interpreted and practiced in a variety of ways.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information