Table of Contents

Carbon Pricing, Growth and the Environment

Carbon Pricing, Growth and the Environment

Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation series

Edited by Larry Kreiser, Ana Yábar Sterling, Pedro Herrera, Janet E. Milne and Hope Ashiabor

The emphasis of the book lies in finding critical solutions to global climate change including chapters on environmental fiscal reform and unemployment in Spain, EU structural and cohesion policy and sustainable development, ecological tax reform in Europe and Asia, Australia’s carbon pricing mechanism, and many other timely topics.

Chapter 10: GHG emissions trading schemes in Northeast Asia: an overview and analysis of current scenarios

Xianbing Liu, Sunhee Suk and Kinichi Sudo

Subjects: economics and finance, environmental economics, public finance, environment, climate change, environmental economics, law - academic, tax law and fiscal policy


The three large economies in Northeast Asia, Japan, China and the Republic of Korea, are all on the top 10 global GHG emitters list. The emissions of China have accelerated in the past two decades, and now surpass the US with China now the largest GHG emitter in the world. The CO2 emissions of the Republic of Korea increased dramatically during 1990–2006, while the emissions of Japan showed only a slight rise in the same period. From an overall perspective, the per capita CO2 emissions of China were still low in 2006, about half those of Japan and Korea, and one quarter those of the US. The intensity of China’s CO2 emissions by gross domestic product (GDP) was over three times that of Japan and twice that of the US (World Bank, 2010). Under the Kyoto Protocol, Japan committed to reducing its 1990 GHG emissions by 6 per cent between 2008 and 2012. As a mid- term target, Japan recently pledged to reduce its GHG emissions by 25 per cent from 1990 levels by 2020, with the proviso that all other major emitting countries achieve aggressive reductions. The Chinese central government set two ambitious climate targets in 2006; one was to reduce the intensity of national energy by 20 per cent by 2010, and the other was to increase the share of renewable energy in the total energy mix to 15 per cent by 2020.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information