Table of Contents

Carbon Pricing, Growth and the Environment

Carbon Pricing, Growth and the Environment

Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation series

Edited by Larry Kreiser, Ana Yábar Sterling, Pedro Herrera, Janet E. Milne and Hope Ashiabor

The emphasis of the book lies in finding critical solutions to global climate change including chapters on environmental fiscal reform and unemployment in Spain, EU structural and cohesion policy and sustainable development, ecological tax reform in Europe and Asia, Australia’s carbon pricing mechanism, and many other timely topics.

Chapter 14: The effects of carbon/energy taxes on R & D expenditure in Sweden

Yasushi Ito

Subjects: economics and finance, environmental economics, public finance, environment, climate change, environmental economics, law - academic, tax law and fiscal policy


‘Dynamic efficiency’ is one of the criteria for evaluating environmental policy instruments. Being dynamically efficient means the incentive effects of promoting the development of technology for low environmental loads are large. Theoretically, market- based instruments (MBIs), such as environmental taxes and tradable emission permits, have greater incentive effects on technology development than command and control regulations for pollution control (Downing and White, 1986; Milliman and Prince, 1989). In these studies, technological development is assumed to cause a downward shift in the marginal abatement cost curve, and cost savings due to innovation are greater under MBIs than under direct regulations; therefore, MBIs are considered to be dynamically efficient. Other researchers, on the contrary, contend that environmental taxes undermine financial resources for firm research and development (R & D) activities and thereby prevent technological development. Several empirical studies have been conducted on the relationship between environmental policy and technological development. For example, Jaffe and Palmer (1997) examine the relationship between the stringency of environmental policies and technological innovation using industry- level panel data from the US. As a measure of innovation, they use expenditures on R & D activities and the number of patents granted, and as a measure of environmental policy stringency, they use costs for environmental protection. They found that while there exists a positive and significant relationship between the stringency of environmental policies and R & D expenditures, a significant relationship between environmental costs and the number of successful patents cannot be established.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information