Table of Contents

Handbook of Research on Islamic Business Ethics

Handbook of Research on Islamic Business Ethics

Research Handbooks in Business and Management series

Edited by Abbas J. Ali

The complex relationship between society and business is vividly captured by ethical standards and obligations. This is especially pertinent in the Islamic world, where religion plays a key role in both social and commercial interactions. Many people see the presence or absence of ethical commitments as an indicator of whether business actors uphold their social responsibilities, and there is an increasing recognition of the significance of ethical value for business. This Handbook explores the interweaving relationship between Islamic business ethics and the market, and examines the critical role that ethics can play in ensuring that business thrives. By offering theoretical perspectives on research it goes beyond the conventional treatment of Islamic ethics, and asks what is important for the various market and social actors in the business world to behave in a morally responsible manner.

Chapter 6: Uncertainty or ‘gharar’ in contracts under the Islamic ethical code

Said Elfakhani and Yusuf M. Sidani

Subjects: business and management, international business


Contracts are legally binding agreements infiltrating almost all aspects of life, without which functioning would be much more difficult (Jenkins, 2011). Contracts require certain essential elements, including: (a) an offer, (b) an acceptance and (c) consideration. Both parties are expected to commit to the fulfillment of the contract within an agreed time or event frame. Occasionally some contracts leave certain issues to be determined later, opening the door for possible disagreements and legal disputes. Such conditions might render the contract void because of uncertainty. According to Adams (2008), ‘Uncertainty in contract language arises principally from six sources – ambiguity, undue generality, inconsistency, redundancy, conflict, and vagueness. The first five are pernicious, whereas the last – vagueness – is an essential drafting tool, when used with restraint.’ A distinction is thus made between vagueness and ambiguity (Barnett, 2010; Leonhard, 2009). A vague term used in a contract refers to lack of precision, whereas an ambiguous one, often pernicious, may have multiple meanings. While vagueness can be tolerated and even expected, ambiguity is something to be avoided, as it can eventually lead to multiple interpretations and disputes. If parties were to spell out their agreement in great detail, this would necessitate substantial negotiation time, which could damage the whole business deal (Leonhard, 2009). In addition, sometimes parties want to keep their options open (Beatty and Samuelson, 2015). However, in most disputes, courts assess whether the dispute emanates from vagueness of terms that was necessary or preferable when the contract was agreed upon, or from inherent ambiguity (Barnett, 2010).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information