Table of Contents

Handbook on the Economics of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity

Handbook on the Economics of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity

Elgar original reference

Edited by Paulo A.L.D. Nunes, Pushpam Kumar and Tom Dedeurwaerdere

In recent years, there has been a marked proliferation in the literature on economic approaches to ecosystem management, which has created a subsequent need for real understanding of the scope and the limits of the economic approaches to ecosystems and biodiversity. Within this Handbook, carefully commissioned original contributions from acknowledged experts in the field address the new concepts and their applications, identify knowledge gaps and provide authoritative recommendations.

Chapter 11: Optimal selection of clustered conservation lands using integer programming: the case of Fort Stewart in Georgia, USA

Sahan T.M. Dissanayake, Hayri Önal, James D. Westervelt and Harold E. Balbach

Subjects: economics and finance, environmental economics, environment, ecological economics, environmental economics

Extract

Suitable habitat areas for many rare, threatened, or endangered species in North America may be located on or near military installations in the USA (Stein et al., 2008). Figure 11.1 shows that Department of Defense (DoD) lands have the highest density of and second highest distribution of endangered and imperiled species amongst all the Federal land management agencies. While military training may cause some habitat deterioration, military control of the lands actually prevents destructive urban and agricultural development. This has the potential to create a concentration of valuable habitat in and around military installations (Orth and Warren, 2006). Besides protection of the lands from alternative economic uses, the DoD also allocates a significant amount of human capital and land for conservation efforts toward protecting and managing wildlife habitat in and around military installations. In 2006, the DoD spent US$4.1 billion on environment-related expenses, of which US$1.4 billion was for environment restoration and US$204.1 million was for conservation (Benton et al., 2008). At the same time, new and conventional training requirements are increasing, making it difficult to set aside land solely for conservation purposes within military installations and elevating the importance of managing military lands for multiple competing objectives. As an alternative to more costly arrangements, such as purchasing land and sharing land with other agencies, effective utilization of the existing lands for conservation and military purposes can be accomplished by designing an optimum landscape that places conservation and military training areas in a desirable spatial configuration.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information