Global Governance and Democracy

Global Governance and Democracy

A Multidisciplinary Analysis

Leuven Global Governance series

Edited by Jan Wouters, Antoon Braekman, Matthias Lievens and Emilie Bécault

Globalization needs effective global governance. The important question of whether this governance can also become democratic is, however, the subject of a political and academic debate that began only recently. This multidisciplinary book aims to move this conversation forward by drawing insights from international relations, political theory, international law and international political economy. Focusing on global environmental, economic, security and human rights governance, it sheds new light on the democratic deficit of existing global governance structures, and proposes a number of tools to overcome it.

Chapter 2: Can we democratize global governance? Two guiding scenarios based on a narrative approach

Alessandro Mulieri

Subjects: economics and finance, political economy, law - academic, regulation and governance, politics and public policy, international politics, international relations, political economy, regulation and governance

Extract

Among the most abused terms in recent political and academic reflection, ‘global governance’ appears to share the same problem as ‘governance’: that of being an ‘empty signifier’ (Offe 2009). Global governance is usually described as the web of formal and informal practices that embrace states, international institutions, transnational networks, agencies (both private and public), non-state actors and so on, that ‘function, with variable effect, to promote, regulate or intervene in the common affairs of humanity’ (Held and McGrew 2002, 1). The academic debate on this topic is considerable and has crossed disciplinary boundaries involving political theorists, international lawyers, political scientists and international relations theorists (Held 1995; Archibugi and Held 1995; Rosenau 1992, 1995, 2004; Held and McGrew 2002). However, disagreement on the definition of global governance is the rule in this debate and focuses mainly on two aspects. First, there is no agreement on the extent to which global governance succeeds, as an explanatory category, in describing the global transformations that have followed the end of the Cold War. In particular, it is not clear whether global governance either breaks or supplements geopolitical modes of steering the world (Callinicos 2002; Rosenberg 2000; Gilpin 2002; Cox 1993; Keohane 2006).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information