Table of Contents

Handbook of Governance and Security

Handbook of Governance and Security

Elgar original reference

Edited by James Sperling

The Handbook of Governance and Security examines the conceptual evolution of security governance and the different manifestations of regional security governance. In particular, James Sperling brings together unique contributions from leading scholars to explore the role of institutions that have emerged as critical suppliers of security governance and the ever-widening set of security issues that can be viewed profitably through a governance lens.

Chapter 10: Northeast Asia

Robert M. Uriu and Tom Le

Subjects: politics and public policy, international politics, international relations, regulation and governance, terrorism and security


Signs of tensions in Northeast Asia in the first half of 2013 have been on the rise. With North Korea making more than its usual threatening noises, simmering tensions over disputed islands, and growing signs of virulent nationalisms, many analysts and observers have struck a pessimistic and alarmist tone. It is as if the realist predictions that post-Cold War Asia will eventually devolve into conflict are at last on the verge of coming true (Betts 1994; Friedberg 1994). One cannot open a newspaper, magazine or website without finding articles or op-eds describing unmanageable tensions or predicting a conflict-laden future. One commentary in Time magazine went so far as to compare Northeast Asia to pre-First World War Europe, the very epitome of a region on the verge of a catastrophic explosion (Tharoor 2013). The first section of this chapter presents this orthodox (read, ‘offensive realist’) view of the sub-region. Using the terminology of this volume, realists see ‘security governance’ in Northeast Asia as limited to its most ‘primitive’ form, with nations threatened by multiple targets of security concern, and the mechanism for conflict resolution taking the form of power balancing and impermanent alliances. In this view, the normative framework undergirding relations is basically limited to the ‘rules of war’, and not only is there no common identity to bind the region together, but rather, fervent nationalisms and historical hatreds are likely to drive the region toward conflict.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information