Table of Contents

Trademark Protection and Territoriality Challenges in a Global Economy

Trademark Protection and Territoriality Challenges in a Global Economy

Elgar Intellectual Property and Global Development series

Edited by Irene Calboli and Edward Lee

As the modern business world becomes increasingly decentralized and globally focused, traditional interpretations and applications of trademark protection law are facing greater and greater challenges. This is particularly true regarding the principle of trademark territoriality, which holds that trademark rights are bound by the laws of individual nations. This timely volume offers expert analyses of the challenges facing crucial aspects of trademark law from some of the most prominent scholars in the field.

Chapter 3: Interactivity, territoriality, and well-known marks

Leah Chan Grinvald

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law, international economic law, trade law


The majority of articles discussing the well-known marks doctrine typically begin with an overview of how the ìglobal marketplaceî has created a space where foreign trademarks easily cross boundaries. These articles cite the advances in technology and travel that allow consumers from different nations to view products and their corresponding trademarks through television, the Internet, and while traveling in foreign countries. Due to this, trademarks that are well known in their home nation can become more easily well known in foreign nations. Therefore, the argument continues, the test for whether a foreign mark has become well known in other nations should be based on the extent to which those foreign consumers had the ability to visually perceive the foreign trademarks (while at home or on foreign travel). I call this theory of well-known marks the ìpassive perceptionî theory because it bases consumer recognition of foreign marks on the ability of consumers to passively perceive foreign trademarks. While these advances in technology and travel are undisputed, the underlying assumptions of the passive perception theory are faulty. The assumptions of the passive perception theory are twofold: that a passive perception theory is consistent with the norms of international trademark law, and that consumers can come to recognize foreign marks simply through visual cues. I seek to disprove these assumptions and, in addition, propose my own theory of well-known marks, one that is based on interaction with foreign marks.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information