Table of Contents

Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements

Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements

Elgar original reference

Edited by Hein-Anton van der Heijden

This Handbook uniquely collates the results of several decades of academic research in these two important fields. The expert contributions successively address the different forms of political citizenship and current approaches and recent developments in social movement studies. Salient social movements in recent history are explored in depth, covering the environmental, women’s, international human rights, urban, Tea Party, and animal rights movements. Social movements and political citizenship in the ‘global South’: China, India, Africa, and the Arab World, are discussed, presenting a novel empirical insight into these fields of study.

Chapter 9: Global and cosmopolitan citizenship

Sebastiaan Tijsterman

Subjects: politics and public policy, european politics and policy, international politics, public choice, social entrepreneurship


The idea of global, cosmopolitan or world citizenship has accompanied reflection of citizenship from its inception in the Greek polis onwards. Diogenes the Cynic is supposed to have said in the fourth century BCE, when asked where he came from, ‘kosmopolites eimi’ (‘I am a citizen of the world’) (Miller, 2011, p. 6). In his essay ‘Perpetual Peace’ (1795) Kant highlights cosmopolitan right as the hospitality owed to all fellow humans. Notwithstanding the philosophical and idea-historical importance of these contributions, the notion of cosmopolitan citizenship has been standing for the most part of the history of political thought in the shadow of territorial citizenship. Citizenship referred primarily to the membership of a specific political community, a polis, empire, or – for the last few centuries – a sovereign (nation-)state. The enjoyment of equal rights, political participation and identity were supposed to require political borders. In this setting, cosmopolitan citizenship could draw attention to the moral shortcomings resulting from the exclusiveness that defines territorial citizenship, but did not constitute a self-sufficient alternative. During the last decades, the idea of global citizenship has been rapidly emancipated from its marginal position. As a consequence of globalization, the key elements of citizenship – identity, moral responsibilities, rights, and political participation – no longer appear to be strictly confined to national political communities. Political identities cut through borders and political activists unite across countries in shared global goals. The number and influence of international governmental and nongovernmental organizations have increased enormously.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information