Table of Contents

Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements

Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements

Elgar original reference

Edited by Hein-Anton van der Heijden

This Handbook uniquely collates the results of several decades of academic research in these two important fields. The expert contributions successively address the different forms of political citizenship and current approaches and recent developments in social movement studies. Salient social movements in recent history are explored in depth, covering the environmental, women’s, international human rights, urban, Tea Party, and animal rights movements. Social movements and political citizenship in the ‘global South’: China, India, Africa, and the Arab World, are discussed, presenting a novel empirical insight into these fields of study.

Chapter 17: The environmental movement

Hein-Anton van der Heijden

Subjects: politics and public policy, european politics and policy, international politics, public choice, social entrepreneurship


There is strong evidence that the environmental movement has been the most influential of all social movements of the past half-century, at least in Western countries. If we make a distinction between substantive, procedural, structural, and sensitizing impacts, this argument could be firmly buttressed. As for substantive impacts, no movement has so decisively influenced political decision-making at the subnational, national, and transnational levels. Examples include law-making with respect to the pollution of air, water, and soil; preventing the construction of highways through pristine nature reserves; diminishing the role of nuclear energy; restricting the use of genetically modified organisms; and so on. Without environmental movements the world would have looked unrecognizably different. Procedural impacts refer to the access a social movement or social movement organization (SMO) has to the subnational, national, and transnational political systems, for instance, by their participation in consultation or negotiation procedures. Examples include the formal recognition of environmental movement organizations (EMOs) in local, regional, and national decision-making procedures; the frequent meetings of the ten most important Europe-level EMOs (‘G10’) in Brussels with the Cabinet of the Environmental Commissioner and even with the President of the European Commission; and the involvement of transnational EMOs in the negotiations on multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) with respect to, for instance, climate change and biodiversity protection.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information