Chapter 14: Concluding remarks
As the preceding chapters have demonstrated, the comic art world is complex, and the creative effort required to create new and original works of sequential art is substantial. The law and legal doctrine, ranging from copyright to contract, tax to obscenity, at times creates constraints to the process, and at other times offers critical support of creators and their works. Readers will no doubt sense that in two areas in which the law intersects with the creative process, there is a need for change. The application of the ‘instance and expense’ test to the characters and comic art created by independent contractors whose works were created prior to the enactment of the Copyright Law of 1976 in the US has resulted in the divestiture of ownership rights, which the subsequently implemented law would otherwise allow. This court-created doctrine, adopted on shaky legal grounds, should be reconsidered and abandoned. Similarly, the ill-conceived and logically inconsistent policies in American jurisprudence on the subject of obscenity have had a devastating impact on the freedom of artists and writers to create new and controversial works of art. It is a function of art that it challenges viewers to consider different values and ideas.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.