Table of Contents

Handbook of the International Political Economy of Trade

Handbook of the International Political Economy of Trade

Handbooks of Research on International Political Economy series

Edited by David Deese

David A. Deese brings together leading researchers and writers from different countries and disciplines in a coherent framework to highlight the most important and promising research and policy questions regarding international trade. The content includes fundamental theory about trade as international communication and its effects on growth and inequality; the domestic politics of trade and trends in government trade policies; the implications of bilateral and regional trade (and investment) agreements; key issues of how trade is governed globally; and how trade continues to define and advance globalization from immigration to the internet.

Chapter 18: “Using ideas strategically”: non-state actors and the politics of trade

Silke Trommer

Subjects: economics and finance, political economy, politics and public policy, international politics, political economy


A new witticism about the relationship between the World Trade Organization (WTO) and so-called “civil society” has emerged in trade circles in recent years. Accordingly, some trade insiders half-humorously, half-nostalgically declare that they miss the protesters of the early 2000s at WTO headquarters in Geneva. Some jokingly reminisce about pushing through hordes of demonstrators in order to attend WTO Ministerial Conferences. The more seriously expressed view that civil society actors have found a new liking for the WTO, because nothing happens at the WTO anymore, has equally gained traction among trade experts. The assessments build on the assumption that corporate and non-corporate non-state groups constitute two distinct and essentially different sets of trade political actors and that the latter’s relationship with trade institutions is necessarily confrontational. The protests around the WTO Ministerial Conference in Seattle in 1999 have become a powerful piece of collective memory that helps to cement this view. The 1999 events sparked a debate on the merits and challenges for a more inclusive trade politics under the post-sovereign conditions resulting from growing governance complexity in the globalization process. Commentators on one side of the spectrum of opinions identified lacking knowledge about international institutions and/or lacking appreciation of the benefits of corporate-driven globalization as the root causes of what they saw as non-corporate non-state actors’ misguided criticism of global trade.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information