Chapter 21: The IPO as an exit strategy for venture capitalists: regional lessons from Canada with international comparisons
The quantity and quality of innovation capital is essential for the success of the development of knowledge-based growth firms in the twenty-first century (Audretsch, 2007a, 2007b). In this regard, government bodies around the world provide much needed support to entrepreneurs and innovators in their capital raising efforts (see, for example, Cumming, 2007 World Bank, 2004) to facilitate the healthy growth of knowledge-based economies. This support comes in the form of indirect government intervention with tax subsidies and other entrepreneur-friendly regulation (for example, lenient bankruptcy laws and lax securities laws), as well as direct government programs to provide capital for entrepreneurs. One rationale for this support is that there is a perception of the existence of a capital gap for entrepreneurs, since the risks to financing early stage high-technology firms is very pronounced and the rewards not sufficient to entice enough investors. A second rationale is that there are returns to society for having innovation and entrepreneurship. Since the private returns do not account for the social returns, there is an insufficient supply of capital for innovation and entrepreneurship.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.