Table of Contents

Polar Oceans Governance in an Era of Environmental Change

Polar Oceans Governance in an Era of Environmental Change

New Horizons in Environmental and Energy Law series

Edited by Tim Stephens and David L. VanderZwaag

This timely book provides a cutting-edge assessment of how the dynamic ocean regions at the highest latitudes on Earth are being managed in an era of unprecedented environmental change. The Arctic and Southern Oceans are experiencing transformative environmental change as a result of climate change and ocean acidification. As areas of unparalleled environmental, cultural and scientific value, they are crucibles for testing how integrated, eco-systemic governance frameworks can be developed to meet and address volatile environmental, political and economic challenges.

Chapter 6: Is joint development possible in the Arctic?

Rizal Abdul Kadir

Subjects: environment, climate change, environmental governance and regulation, environmental law, law - academic, environmental law, public international law, politics and public policy, international relations


The Arctic region, the land and ocean north of the Arctic Circle, may hold some 22 per cent of as yet undiscovered global oil and gas resources. About 84 per cent of these resources are located offshore. Eight states are the main strategic stakeholders in the Arctic region, and five of these states border the Arctic Ocean, several with overlapping maritime claims, including to the continental shelf. The overlapping maritime claims are relevant to a range of maritime uses in the Arctic, including resource development, tourism, navigation by merchant and naval vessels, and the management of the polar ocean environment. Several chapters in this volume address the issue of continental shelf claims in the Arctic, and note that significant work remains to delineate the outer limits of the continental shelf and to delimit maritime boundaries in areas of overlap. To realize the substantial resource development potential of the Arctic Ocean, in a context in which there is disagreement over continental shelf delimitation, joint development arrangements may provide a way forward. Indeed several coastal states in the Arctic region have already pursued some form of joint development arrangement alongside agreement reached on maritime boundaries. Viewed in this light, joint development of extended continental shelf areas would be a continuation of 'business as usual' for Arctic states.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information