Table of Contents

Handbook of International Security and Development

Handbook of International Security and Development

Edited by Paul Jackson

The Handbook of International Security and Development provides a survey of current thinking within the field of security and development. With a wide range of chapters that offer a guide to the core approaches, methods and issues, this book explores the links between the two and includes contributions from both practitioners and academics. With topics ranging from the politics of aid by remote control through to intervention and the re-establishment of security and demobilisation of combatants, this Handbook provides a comprehensive introduction to the literature and approaches used in the field of security and development.

Chapter 26: Lessons from peace processes: the case of Nepal

Geja Sharma Wagle and Paul Jackson

Subjects: development studies, development studies, law - academic, terrorism and security law, politics and public policy, international politics, terrorism and security


Peace agreements are supposed to lead to peace. Formal agreements that are aimed at ending conflict and creating conditions for sustainable peace have a remarkably patchy history. There have been hundreds of peace agreements, including over 40 comprehensive peace agreements since 1990. The rest cover a variety of measures ranging from ceasefire agreements, interim agreements, preliminary arrangements, framework agreements and implementation agreements. This bewildering array of documentation has had a poor record of actually brining about comprehensive peace. Given that these agreements cover fewer than 90 countries, this provides an average of more than seven per jurisdiction. The way that conflict ends clearly affects the nature and the duration of the peace. Despite the poor record of peace agreements in general, they remain important to peace processes and continue to be regarded as signalling the end of the conflict. Given that relapse into violence is common, full implementation of peace agreements is frequently seen as a key milestone, but, at the same time, peace agreements may be relatively vague, leaving the detail to be worked out in subsequent negotiations. The example of Nepal in this chapter is an example where there was little detail within the peace agreement itself, but the transitional arrangements, including power sharing, were relatively successful in making a transition to a democratic government. The failure of peace agreements in general has been attributed to a number of factors, both national and international.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information