Biomaterials Innovation

Biomaterials Innovation

Bundling Technologies and Life

Alexander Styhre

Rapid advances in the life sciences means that there is now a far more detailed understanding of biological systems on the cellular, molecular and genetic levels. Sited at the intersection between the life sciences, the engineering sciences and the design sciences, innovations in the biomaterials industry are expected to garner increasing attention and play a key role in future development. This book examines the biomaterials innovations taking place in corporations and in academic research settings today.

Chapter 2: Bios, materiality and biomateriality

Alexander Styhre

Subjects: business and management, organisational innovation, innovation and technology, biotechnology, organisational innovation


Arranged one way, matter is coal; arranged another way, it is diamond. Eugene Thacker (2004: 121) Like all concepts anchored in a particular literary and methodological tradition, the concepts of materiality and biomaterials as they are used in this monograph are co-produced within the wider epistemological and theoretical framework that constitutes the interdisciplinary field of organization theory. Materiality thus means different things for an engineer, a biologist, a jurist and a manager, and consequently the organization theory enactment of the term includes a few specific features. While materiality is in many ways portrayed as a free-standing resource to exploit in organizations, much of the recent philosophical literature and studies of technoscientific practices underline the co-production of materiality, experimental systems and organizational arrangements, including domains of professional expertise and jurisdiction. That is, materiality is both produced by and constitutive of the various activities in which it is embedded. In Longino’s (1992: 332) formulation, Scientific knowledge is not simply a matter of apprehending a nature, waiting to be discovered. Nature is described and understood through the mediation of assumptions, themselves heterogeneously formed by generalization, analogy, social and personal aspiration. But neither are our beliefs about the natural world simply a projection of our contextual values. The ultimate test of adequacy is experimental. ‘Scientific technologies … are highly elaborated symbolic systems, not neutral media for “knowing” nature’, Fujimura (1996: 66) adds.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information