Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Cross-border Enforcement of Intellectual Property

Research Handbook on Cross-border Enforcement of Intellectual Property

Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Paul Torremans

The Research Handbook on Cross-border Enforcement of Intellectual Property systematically analyses the unique difficulties posed by cross-border intellectual property disputes in the modern world. The contributions to this book focus on the enforcement of intellectual property primarily from a cross-border perspective. Infringement remains a problematic issue for emerging economies and so the book assesses some of the enforcement structures in a selection of these countries, as well as cross-border enforcement from a private international law perspective. Finally, the book offers a unique insight into the roles played by judges and arbitrators involved in cross-border intellectual property dispute resolution.

Chapter 9: Choice of law in IP: Rounding off territoriality

Carmen Otero García-Castrillón

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law, private international law


From their inception, the different intellectual property rights (IPRs) have progressively enlarged their geographical sphere of action. Nowadays, international communications between creators and users are facilitated and the very creative processes can take place in trans-boundary scenarios. In this context, Private International Law (PIL) has gained relevance for an effective enforcement of the distinct IPRs, whose defense can be pursued in issues related to the right as such (existence and ownership), to their infringement or to their presence in contractual relationships. Notwithstanding eventually differentiated analysis, the oscillating intellectual property concept is approached holistically in PIL. Once the jurisdiction issue is resolved, courts (jurisdictional or arbitral) need to establish the law that will apply to the particular IPR dispute. Choice of law is intrinsically linked to the jurisdiction since courts use their own (forum) conflict of law rules. Without forgetting the margin left for forum substantive law, these rules can lead to the application of one or more foreign laws. Therefore, in facing the jurisdiction issue it is advisable to make a prospective analysis of the choice of law rules that would be applied by a particular court. The increasing trend to allow the consolidation of multistate infringement claims before a single court reinforces the practical importance of the applicable law issue. A number of international conventions introduced substantive harmonization of IPRs and certain regional integration processes – like the European Union (EU) – have harmonized national laws and created unitary IPRs.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information