Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Cross-border Enforcement of Intellectual Property

Research Handbook on Cross-border Enforcement of Intellectual Property

Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Paul Torremans

The Research Handbook on Cross-border Enforcement of Intellectual Property systematically analyses the unique difficulties posed by cross-border intellectual property disputes in the modern world. The contributions to this book focus on the enforcement of intellectual property primarily from a cross-border perspective. Infringement remains a problematic issue for emerging economies and so the book assesses some of the enforcement structures in a selection of these countries, as well as cross-border enforcement from a private international law perspective. Finally, the book offers a unique insight into the roles played by judges and arbitrators involved in cross-border intellectual property dispute resolution.

Chapter 19: ACTA and cross-border enforcement of intellectual property

Michael Blakeney

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law, private international law


The promulgation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) is explained as originating as a response to the frustration which principally the US and the EU shared about the inadequacy of the existing international IPR regime to deal with the growth of counterfeiting and piracy. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was identified by industry lobbyists as a more effective agency for the effective enforcement of IPRs because it contained the sanctions of withdrawal of tariff preferences for developing countries which were perceived to be an important source of infringing goods, as well as the GATT dispute resolution system. Drahos and Sell have charted the detail of the role played by these lobbyists in the TRIPS negotiations. The creation of the WTO as the body responsible for the administration of the GATT and of the TRIPS Agreement suggested that IPR enforcement would be placed on a sound footing. In 1986 when the Uruguay Round was launched the size of the global trade in counterfeit goods was estimated to be $US 60 billion. However, within ten years of the commencement of the TRIPS Agreement estimates were published of a more than ten-fold increase in counterfeiting and piracy to at least $US 650 billion annually, although Fink et al., Yager and Chow question the accuracy of these statistics. Reichman and Lange drew attention to the weakness of the enforcement provisions of TRIPS.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information