Table of Contents

Indigenous Intellectual Property

Indigenous Intellectual Property

A Handbook of Contemporary Research

Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Matthew Rimmer

This Handbook considers the international struggle to provide for proper and just protection of Indigenous intellectual property. Leading scholars consider legal and policy controversies over Indigenous knowledge in the fields of international law, copyright law, trademark law, patent law, trade secrets law, and cultural heritage. This collection examines national developments in Indigenous intellectual property from around the world. As well as examining the historical origins of conflicts over Indigenous knowledge, the volume examines new challenges to Indigenous intellectual property from emerging developments in information technology, biotechnology, and climate change.

Chapter 15: Legislating on biopiracy in Europe: too little, too late?

Angela Daly

Subjects: law - academic, cultural heritage and art law, human rights, intellectual property law


Europe holds an interesting dual position when it comes to issues of biopiracy and Indigenous or traditional knowledge: Europe houses some of the major international corporations keen to patent or otherwise monetise naturally occurring phenomena, yet has its own rich history and practice of ‘traditional knowledge’, particularly in the areas of agriculture and biodiversity, as well as the high biodiversity of parts of the overseas remnants of the European colonial empires such as French Guiana. However, Europe has been complicit in instances of biopiracy, i.e. the unauthorised extraction and use of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge, particularly against countries and communities in the Global South. This complicity has been manifested in European law enforcement agencies effectively turning a blind eye to European-based corporations’ involvement in unauthorised bioprospecting, as well as intellectual property institutions such as the European Patent Office (EPO) being willing to issue patents for biotechnological ‘inventions’ which include the ill-gotten gains of such instances of biopiracy – i.e. genetic resources and/or associated traditional knowledge extracted in an unauthorised and inequitable fashion from the Global South. Against this backdrop and as an attempt to remedy the situation in order to offer more protection and compensation to the custodians of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge used in the European Union, the European Parliament has been debating a new law which would implement the Nagoya Protocol 2010 into European Union law in the form of a regulation.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information