Knowledge, Diversity and Performance in European Higher Education

Knowledge, Diversity and Performance in European Higher Education

A Changing Landscape

Edited by Andrea Bonaccorsi

For the first time, data on individual European higher education institutions (rather than data aggregated at the country level) is used in order to examine a wide range of issues that are both theoretically challenging and relevant from policy-making and societal perspectives. The contributors integrate statistics on universities and colleges with other sources of information such as patents, start-up firms and bibliometric data, and employ rigorous empirical methods to address a range of key questions, including: what is the role of non-university tertiary education, such as vocational training? How important is the private sector? Are European universities internationalized? Are they efficient from the point of view of costs and educational output? Are there pure research universities in Europe? How do universities contribute to economic growth?

Chapter 8: Is the university model an organizational necessity? Scale and agglomeration effects in science

Tasso Brandt and Torben Schubert

Subjects: business and management, management and universities, economics and finance, economics of education, economics of innovation, education, economics of education, management and universities, innovation and technology, economics of innovation


In almost every country, universities are the most important places where basic research is conducted. A dominant organizational design has emerged here, according to which universities can be thought of as (usually) large agglomerations of relatively small individual research groups that are linked by an overarching, yet relatively weak, management level. To facilitate our argumentation we will call this the 'standard university model'. Acknowledging that this organizational structure is the result of historical and path-dependent processes, the question remains whether its development can also be explained in terms of economic pressures for efficiency. Or, in other words, is the university (set up as a large co-location of small research groups) an efficient organizational design? This is an important question for several reasons. First of all, the adequacy of the organizational structures is probably a strong determinant of the fitness of an organization in an evolutionary process of survival (Nelson and Winter, 1982; Hodgson, 1993). In this respect, this dominant organizational design may have emerged as the outcome of a continuous evolutionary process that eventually selected the best organizational structure for science, in line with Fisher's Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection (Mulder et al., 2001). Therefore, analysing the adequacy of the organizational structures of universities could pave the way for understanding (some of) the driving forces behind their organizational evolution.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information