Indirect Expropriation in International Law

Indirect Expropriation in International Law

Leuven Global Governance series

Sebastián López Escarcena

Sebastián López Escarcena offers a comprehensive coverage of the history and main concepts of the international law of expropriation. The interaction between human rights conventions and investment treaties are analysed from a global perspective, providing the reader with a unique insight into expropriation at an international level. Within the course of his examination, the author illuminates important concepts of public law, from deprivation of property to payment of compensation, and from margin of appreciation to proportionality.

Chapter 2: From compensation to indirect takings

Sebastián López Escarcena

Subjects: law - academic, public international law


The long debate on the payment of compensation for the expropriation of aliens was based on historical and ideological differences between capital-exporting and capital-importing states. According to developed countries, an international minimum standard stressing the need for a prompt, adequate and effective compensation was required in cases of expropriation of foreign property, guaranteeing the full value of the lost investment. Developing and communist states, as well as those countries that gained their independence from colonial rule in the aftermath of the Second World War, proposed national treatment as a minimum and maximum standard requiring appropriate compensation, to be determined by the expropriating state, in conformity with its municipal law. In practice, this meant the payment of a compensation that would range from the full value of the taken property to none, depending on each particular case. While these two views collided at the UN General Assembly, significant changes in international economy and politics gradually reshaped state policies, legislation and practice on the protection of aliens. The collapse of communism and the progressive liberalisation of national and international economies led erstwhile statist-orientated countries to desire foreign investment. For this purpose, they enacted investment codes and concluded international agreements that promote and protect foreign investment in the traditional terms advanced by capital-exporting states. Both the national and international treatment standards were included in these treaties. The exclusive standard of national treatment, advocated diplomatically by second- and third-world countries, was thus conventionally defeated.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information