Boosting Pharmaceutical Innovation in the Post-TRIPS Era

Boosting Pharmaceutical Innovation in the Post-TRIPS Era

Real-Life Lessons for the Developing World

Burcu Kilic

This timely book investigates the concept of innovation and illustrates the crucial role that patent strategies play within processes of pharmaceutical innovation. Drawing on extensive country and company case studies, it identifies the key issues relevant to the revival of local pharmaceutical industries. Based on an understanding of the post-TRIPS environment and case studies of national innovation strategies, it specifically addresses an important question – to what extent can lessons from national experiences be transferred to current policy developments for innovation in the pharmaceutical industry in a developing country context?

Chapter 5: Innovation country case studies

Burcu Kilic

Subjects: law - academic, biotechnology and pharmaceutical law, intellectual property law

Extract

It is important to identify and present the most relevant indicators for innovation and to explain how these indicators can be interpreted and used in policy design. In order to embody a deep knowledge of innovation and generate a number of theoretical propositions for explaining the potential outcomes a case study method may be adopted. The experiences of the United States (US), Japan, South Korea and Israel may well provide an analysis of contemporary issues with regard to innovation and an explanation of how these issues have been addressed in each of those countries. In this chapter, the case study of each of these countries will set the context and assess both past and current experiences. In doing so, the study will define the relevant issues, analyse the various models or strategies, describe the current approaches and identify any obstacles and criticisms. As an early developing country, the US case study concentrates on the relevant legal framework within its national innovation system (NIS). The second case study, on the Japanese innovation system, gives an overview of Japanese experience in this area. It illustrates the changing role of the intellectual property rights (IPRs) system throughout the development process of the country. The third case study discusses the experience of Korea as a relatively late catching-up country. The study reveals the characteristics of the Korean national innovation system as well as the patent regime.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information