Table of Contents

Research Handbook on EU Internet Law

Research Handbook on EU Internet Law

Research Handbooks in European Law series

Edited by Andrej Savin and Jan Trzaskowski

This innovative book provides an overview of the latest developments and controversies in European Internet law. It is grouped in sections that correspond to the most disputed areas, looking consecutively at policy and governance, copyright, private international law, E-commerce & consumer protection and citizens and their position on the Internet. More than a basic introduction. The authors go further than a basic introduction into the field, as they highlight the challenges that European law- and policy-makers face when attempting to regulate the Internet.

Chapter 10: Jurisdiction over cyber torts under the Brussels I Regulation

Sandrine Brachotte and Arnaud Nuyts

Subjects: law - academic, european law, information and media law, international commercial law, internet and technology law


In a series of four recent cases, the European Court of Justice has devised a new jurisdictional framework for jurisdiction over cyber torts under art. 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (‘Brussels I Regulation’). In these cases, the Court has been called to rethink its classical interpretation of this provision dating back to 1976. The cases concern respectively the online infringement of personality rights (eDate Advertising and Martinez), the online infringement of trademark (Wintersteiger), the online use of databases (Football Dataco), and the online infringement of copyright (Pinckney). In the meantime, the Brussels I Regulation has been the subject of a recast. It has been replaced, as from 10 January 2015, by Regulation (UE) No. 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (‘Brussels I Bis Regulation’). Because of the removal of the specific rule of jurisdiction for alimonies (a matter which is now subject to a separate instrument), what was art. 5(3) of Brussels I has now become art. 7(2) of Brussels I Bis, though the wording of the provision has not been changed. This chapter presents an analytical overview of the matter, with a focus on the latest developments that stem from the four recent cases identified above. The purpose of the contribution is to identify the principles applied by the European Court of Justice in cyber torts cases.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information