The Challenge of Local Government Size

The Challenge of Local Government Size

Theoretical Perspectives, International Experience and Policy Reform

Studies in Fiscal Federalism and State–local Finance series

Edited by Santiago Lago-Peñas and Jorge Martinez-Vazquez

Expert contributors in economics and political science offer a comprehensive breakdown of the issue of local jurisdiction fragmentation and provide recommendations for successful policy reform. Topics discussed include economies of scale, the costs and benefits of voluntary and forced amalgamation programs, the correlation between government size and corruption, privatization, and inter-municipal cooperation. A combination of theory and empirical evidence provides depth and makes this book an invaluable addition to the literature.

Chapter 5: Do fiscal decentralization and government fragmentation affect corruption in different ways? Evidence from a panel data analysis

Nadia Fiorino, Emma Galli and Fabio Padovano

Subjects: economics and finance, public sector economics, politics and public policy, public policy


Are countries characterized by more decentralized fiscal and spending powers less corrupt? Or is a higher degree of government fragmentation a more effective way to reduce and deter corruption? And finally, is there any evidence that these alternative ways to enhance government accountability reinforce or hinder each other? These are the three questions that the empirical analysis presented in this chapter will try to answer. The idea that centralization brings about high levels of rent-seeking, corruption and lack of accountability of government officials is behind the demand for greater decentralization that has characterized many OECD and non OECD countries since the 1990s (Rodden et al., 2003; Arzaghi and Henderson, 2005; Bardhan and Mookherjee, 2005). These decentralization reforms have taken two main directions: the devolution of tax and spending power to sub-national governments, i.e. fiscal decentralization, and/or the increase in the number of sub-national units of government, i.e. government fragmentation. There is still much debate over which of the two facets of decentralization shows a greater effectiveness in deterring corruption and improving the quality of governance. So far neither has the theoretical literature drawn unambiguous predictions nor has the empirical one produced conclusive evidence.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information