The archetypical form of grabbing is stealing, plain and simple. This is where someone simply grabs some object without any form of compensation to the owner ñ who might have invested in the ownership or has, by other socially legitimate ways, established ownership rights over it. In crime statistics we may distinguish between different forms of stealing such as burglary, robbery, pick pocketing, car theft and so on. We can also usefully distinguish between theft accompanied with or without (threats of) violence. In large societies the scope of random theft through the use of violence is greater since mass mobility and large populations mean the risk of identification may be modest. Theft by known perpetrators may also be combined with violence either under a Hobbesian-like state of nature, where the strongest may steal: if the perpetrator and owner belong to different jurisdictions, or if the owner of the object has to submit to an organization that may apply violence on a regular basis, such as a local gang . The main method so far to gauge quantitatively the extent of citizen-to-citizen grabbing is by means of victimization studies where a sample of citizens are asked about their (or their householdís) experiences with crime during a given period.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.