Table of Contents

Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law

Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law

Research Handbooks in European Law series

Edited by Adam Lazowski and Steven Blockmans

Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law offers a critical look into the European Union: its legal foundations, competences and institutions. It provides an analysis of the EU legal system, its application at the national level and the prevalent role of the Court of Justice. Throughout the course of the Handbook the expert contributors discuss whether the European Union is well equipped for the 21st century and the numerous crises it has to handle. They revisit the call for an EU reform made in the Laeken Conclusions in 2001 to verify if its objectives have been achieved by the Treaty of Lisbon and in daily practice of the EU institutions. The book also delves into the concept of a Europe of different speeds, which - according to some - is inevitable in the EU comprising 28 Member States. Overall, the assessment of the changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty is positive, even if there are plenty of suggestions for further reforms to re-fit the EU for purpose.

Chapter 10: Judicial review in EU law: a post-Lisbon perspective

Saulius Lukas Kalėda

Subjects: law - academic, european law


Judicial review of measures adopted by public authorities is a fundamental constitutional guarantee constituting one of the pillars of the rule of law. It is also a vast subject in comparative public law, given that the conditions for judicial review vary among the legal systems, making it difficult to find a common denominator. Although it is generally recognised as an intrinsic element of democratic society, the right to review of a public measure by an independent court has no one accepted axiological justification. Judicial review may be regarded as a mechanism which institutionalises the right to justification, by guaranteeing that only those laws are enforced which can be justified by reasons that a person might reasonably accept as a free and equal citizen. From that perspective, the right to contest acts of public authorities is one of the basic commitments of liberal democracy, just as the equal right to vote in free and fair elections. This chapter explores the functioning of judicial review in the legal order of the European Union from the perspective of three intertwined positions. First, the following part of the chapter outlines the general context of the debate: it comments on the role of judicial review in Union law, addresses some of its specificities which are due to the existence of a multilevel system of judiciary and analyses the main elements of judicial review as reshaped by the Lisbon Treaty.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information