Elgar Companions to International Courts and Tribunals series
Chapter 12: Procedure and process
How is the Court seized of a dispute? Seizing the Court is the starting point of the procedure; a valid seizing will lead to the case being entered on the list of pending cases at the ICJ. The question of seizing is concerned only with the way in which a case may be brought before the Court; the question of the Court’s jurisdiction to hear a case of which it has been seized is a separate matter. It will, if necessary, be tested at the preliminary objections phase. It would be wrong to argue that when the Court is duly seized of a case it thus automatically has jurisdiction to hear it. There are other matters to be noted here. First, article 40 of the Statute provides: ‘Cases are brought before the Court, as the case may be, either by the notification of the special agreement or by a written application addressed to the Registrar.’ The Court can thus be seized of a case through either the joint or unilateral notification of a special agreement establishing its jurisdiction. It can also be seized by a unilateral application in two sets of circumstances: (i) a compulsory pre-existing jurisdictional agreement; or (ii) an express or implied request to the respondent to agree to the Court’s jurisdiction on the basis of the forum prorogatum.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.