Table of Contents

Comparative Law and Regulation

Comparative Law and Regulation

Understanding the Global Regulatory Process

Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Francesca Bignami and David Zaring

Governance by regulation – rules propounded and enforced by bureaucracies – is taking a growing share of the sum total of governance. Once thought to be an American phenomenon, it is now a central form of state action in every part of the world, including Europe, Latin America, and Asia, and it is at the core of much international lawmaking. In Comparative Law and Regulation, original contributions by leading scholars in the field focus both on the legal dimension of regulation and on how this dimension operates in those places that have turned to regulation to meet their obligations.

Chapter 12: Structural reform litigation, regulation and the right to health in Colombia

Everaldo Lamprea, Lisa Forman and Audrey R. Chapman

Subjects: law - academic, comparative law, regulation and governance


Since it was created in 1991, the Colombian Constitutional Court has emerged as a key player in the domestic regulatory process. In policy areas as diverse as presidential powers to declare “states of emergency,” rights of same-sex couplesand tax policy, the Court has operated both as a negative regulator—that is, striking down unconstitutional statutes and regulations—and, somewhat more unusually from a comparative perspective, as a positive regulator, setting the agenda for legislative and regulatory reform. This trend has been especially apparent in the health care sector where the Court, based on the constitutional right to health, has become a major player in redesigning the Colombian health care system. In the early 1990s, a state reform of the health care system led both to the privatization of service delivery and to the creation of a universal system in which all citizens were entitled to health care through a public–private insurance scheme. This scheme was supposed to be heavily regulated by the government and by independent, technical agencies. However, various deficiencies in the reform’s implementation process due to low regulatory capacity led individuals to turn—massively—to lower courts and the Constitutional Court for the treatments and medications supposedly covered by the scheme but which had been denied by private insurance companies. As right-to-health litigation escalated in Colombia—making it the most litigious country in Latin America—the Court’s case law grew and culminated in a 2008 groundbreaking opinion on the right-to-health.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information