Chapter 4: Evaluating the policy options
A first option is to do nothing. Policy-makers could choose to either ignore the shadow economy or to put it another way, adopt a ‘laissez-faire’ approach towards such work. Superficially, it seems obvious that governments would wish to tackle the shadow economy, not least in order to facilitate economic growth and raise tax revenues in a fair and just manner in order to pay for wider social cohesion measures. Nonetheless, there are rationales for doing nothing. First, there is the cost to government of tackling the shadow economy. It might well be the case, especially when the shadow economy is relatively small in a country, that the revenue-to-cost ratios are so low that it is just not worthwhile for governments to intervene to reduce its size. Second, it could be argued that since the shadow economy is a test-bed out of which emerges many, if not the majority, of new business start-ups, and the breeding ground for enterprise creation (Williams and Martinez-Perez, 2014a), this sphere should be left alone. Third, in many countries much of the shadow economy is composed of paid favours, which represent a main vehicle for delivering active citizenship.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.